What information can radiocarbon dating tell paleontologists jewish dating sites org

29 Dec

In the 4th century BC, the Greek philosopher Plato somewhat flippantly defined "man" as an erect and featherless biped.

In most instances, their discovery was the work of paleontologists as a somewhat incidental by-product of their efforts at recovering the much more abundant skeletal remains of various kinds of prehistoric mammals (see Skeleton).

One would expect, then, that the evidence for the increasing complexity of the prehistoric cultural record would be linked to an increase in brain size of the associated prehistoric hominids. Researchers can assess brain size and the form of limbs and feet of prehistoric specimens to see what they can tell us about the course of human development.

It is much less easy, however, to tell such things as whether or not the prehistoric creatures in question had lost their fur coatings yet or whether they had developed the capacity for articulate speech.

Obviously, females are of equal importance to the survival of the human species, and, somewhat belatedly, the field of biological anthropology has come to realize that males and females require equal attention if the phenomenon of humankind and how it emerged from its nonhuman predecessors is ever to be understood.

It came as something of a surprise when scientists determined that human beings share almost 99 percent of their genetic material with chimpanzees.